Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android |
| 2021-04-28 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 229.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | TFT |
| 411 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.68 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 has a score of 84.7, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S's global score of 78.2. The Samsung Galaxy A32 comes with Android operating system, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S works with Android 11 operating system. Although it's the best in this comparison review, the Samsung Galaxy A32 is a heavier and just a bit thicker cellphone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has an incredibly better display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much better 1080 x 2400 resolution and way more pixels per inch in the screen. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy A32 takes better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, although it has a lot worse resolution back-facing camera, they both have the same aperture. The Samsung Galaxy A32 features a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a battery duration that is very similar to Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S's battery duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.