Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-04-28 | 2019-09-29 |
| 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 229.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M30s is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, getting an 83.3 score against 78.2. Even being the best device in this review, we must highlight that it is also an older, a little heavier and a bit thicker device. These phones have the same Android 11 OS, so they should provide the user all the same OS features.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S also has a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little better screen pixels density. Galaxy M30s has a very superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Galaxy M30s also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy M30s counts with a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Galaxy M30s has a better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, although it has a back camera with a way worse resolution and a smaller aperture. The Samsung Galaxy M30s features improved battery duration than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because it has a 20 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.