Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.2 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-04-28 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 229.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G95 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, with a global score of 85.5 against 78.2. Although Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a better cellphone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, we must highlight that it is also a lot older, just a little bit heavier and just a little bit thicker.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a little bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S features a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has much more brightness, a quite greater screen pixel density, a bit bigger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, although it has a back facing camera with a much worse resolution and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking pictures and/or video in low-light situations. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because it has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB and 192 GB more internal storage.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.