Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.1 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6P is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, having an 80.3 score against 77.1. Google Nexus 6P's design is just a little bit thinner and lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G. The Google Nexus 6P has a much better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features just a bit better screen than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a just a little inferior pixels amount per inch of display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 2080 x 2400px and a bigger display. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G takes much better pictures and videos than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also has a lot more megapixels back-facing camera and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light photos and video.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a way better battery lifetime than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3450mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.