Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White | Black, Blue and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.12 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel XL has a global score of 81.3, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G's 77.1 score. The Google Pixel XL construction is a little thicker but somewhat lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G. The Google Pixel XL has a really superior performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features just a bit better screen than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a just a little lower quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bigger display and a bit higher 2080 x 2400 pixels resolution. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features a much better storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel XL, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1 TB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G takes much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also has a camera with way more megapixels and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light images.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a way better battery life than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 45% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.