Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.1 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A80 is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, with a overall score of 84.9 against 77.1. Although it's the best in this comparison review, Samsung Galaxy A80 is a just a little bit heavier and thicker device than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G. Galaxy A80 features a way better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A80 also has 2 GB more RAM.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy A80, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also has a quite higher amount of pixels per inch in the display and a higher resolution of 2080 x 2400px. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A80, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits up to 1 TB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has longer battery performance than Galaxy A80, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3700mAh. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a superior camera than Galaxy A80, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also has a bigger camera aperture to capture better images in low-light environments and a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.