Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| -- | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White | Black and Gold |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C9 Pro is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, having a score of 81 against 77.1. Both devices we are comparing here use Android OS, but the Galaxy C9 Pro has the newer 6.0 Marshmallow version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has Android 11 version, so it gives some extra features and enhanced performance. The Galaxy C9 Pro is a somewhat thinner and a bit lighter phone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G.
Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a lot better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G. Both of them have 8 CPU cores and a 6 GB RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a little bit larger display, a better pixels amount per inch of screen and a lot better 2080 x 2400 resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features a lot bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G shoots a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also has a lot higher (4K) video quality and a back facing camera with a way higher 108 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.