Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White | Black and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 6.12 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, with a 77.8 score against 77.1. Both phones in this review have Android OS, but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has Android 11. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro construction is notably thinner but a bit heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with just a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has 10 GB more RAM. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with much more brightness, a bigger display and a slightly better 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with much more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, because although it has a camera with a much worse 50 MP resolution, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition and a bigger aperture to capture better low light photos and videos.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with just a bit better battery life than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, because it has a 14% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.