Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| -- | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| -- | Black and Gold |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is a bit better than Galaxy C9 Pro, with an 86.1 score against 81. Even being the best phone in this comparison review, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro construction is thicker and just a little heavier than the Galaxy C9 Pro. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has 11 version while Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a bit bigger display, a much higher 2080 x 2400 resolution and more pixels per inch in the display. Galaxy C9 Pro has a bit more storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds up to 256 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy C9 Pro. Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a very superior camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a F1.9 diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also has a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a camera in the back with a lot higher 108 MP resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 29 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.