Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.1 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.1 |
| -- | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold and Gray |
| -- | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 6.88 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a global score of 86.1, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy S6 edge+'s 79.3 general score. Both devices in this comparison include Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a more recent 11 version and Galaxy S6 edge+ has Android 5.1 version. Despite being the best we compare here, Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro's construction is noticeably heavier and thicker than Galaxy S6 edge+.
The Galaxy S6 edge+ has a sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because although it has a bit worse 2560 x 1440 resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixel number in each screen inch. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a better performing processor than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a greater number of faster cores and a higher amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with a much bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 128 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a very superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 5160mAh battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a way better camera than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also has a camera in the back with a lot higher 108 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.