Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.30 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5160mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro is much better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with an 86.1 score against 77.8. These devices include Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has older 11 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro's body is a bit lighter but way thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with an incredibly better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because although it has a just a bit lower screen pixels density, it also counts with a bigger display and a bit higher resolution of 2200 x 2480px. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with much more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro features a much better performing processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because although it has a camera in the back with a much lower 50 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture for better photos and video in low light situations and a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a little better battery duration than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity instead of 5160mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.