Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.2 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.44 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 481 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 810 MT6833 (6 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS Max has a general score of 84.5, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11's 82.2 overall score. IPhone XS Max's design is just a bit heavier but thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11. IPhone XS Max counts with a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, because although it has an inferior number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
The Apple iPhone XS Max features a little sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, although it has a just a bit worse pixels number per screen inch, a little worse resolution of 1242 x 2688 and a little bit smaller display. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 has a lot bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone XS Max, because it has 128 GB internal storage.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 counts with a way better battery performance than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Apple iPhone XS Max takes a bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, because although it has a back facing camera with a way worse 12 megapixels resolution, and they both have a same size aperture, the Apple iPhone XS Max also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor which offers a lot better image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.