Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 496 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G96 MediaTek Helio G96 (6 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 6.03 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 8 has a global score of 85, which is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S's global score of 73.9. Apple iPhone 8's design is lighter and a little bit thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S. IPhone 8 features a very superior CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, because although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster) and lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S counts with a more vivid display than iPhone 8, because it has much more screen brightness, a lot better resolution of 2080 x 2400px, a way bigger display and a lot higher pixel count per inch in the screen. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S has just a bit better camera than iPhone 8, because although it has a much tinier sensor offering a way worse image quality and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for taking images and video in low light situations, it also counts with a lot higher 108 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
IPhone 8 has a bit bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S features a really longer battery lifetime than iPhone 8, because it has a 175 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.