Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 496 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G96 MediaTek Helio G96 (6 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 6.03 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS Max has a general score of 84.5, which is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S's general score of 73.9. The Apple iPhone XS Max is a heavier but just a little bit thinner cellphone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S features a bit more vivid display than iPhone XS Max, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2080 x 2400 pixels, way more display brightness and a just a bit greater display density.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S counts with a lot bigger storage for games and applications than iPhone XS Max, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB. IPhone XS Max counts with a much powerful processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, because although it has an inferior number of cores , and they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the iPhone XS Max also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S features a really longer battery performance than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S features a slightly better camera than iPhone XS Max, because although it has a tinier aperture and a much smaller camera sensor capturing less light and dull colors, it also counts with a much more megapixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.