Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| -- | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 496 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G96 MediaTek Helio G96 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A80 is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, getting an 84.9 score against 73.9. Although it's the best we are comparing, the Galaxy A80 is a thicker and heavier device than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S. The Samsung Galaxy A80 features a much faster processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy A80 also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy A80, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a higher resolution of 2080 x 2400. Galaxy A80 captures slightly better photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for taking photos or video in low-light environments and a way lower resolution camera, it also counts with a lot larger back camera sensor which offers a way better photo and video quality.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S features a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S features superior battery life than Galaxy A80, because it has a 35% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.