Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| -- | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 496 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G96 MediaTek Helio G96 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note9 has a general score of 87.1, which is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S's 73.9 score. Even being the best cellphone we compare here, the Galaxy Note9 body is heavier and a bit thicker than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S. Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with a very superior hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 also has more RAM.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has a bit lower display pixel density, and they both have a screen of the same size, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 2080 x 2400. Samsung Galaxy Note9 features a slightly bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that admits 512 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S has a bit better camera than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a lot smaller back-facing camera sensor and a way smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a way more mega pixels back facing camera. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S has improved battery lifetime than Galaxy Note9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.