Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.9 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | -- |
| -- | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.29 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 2080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 496 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G96 MediaTek Helio G96 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, getting an 85.5 score against 73.9. Even being the best in this comparison, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 body is just a bit thicker and a little bit heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S has a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen, a bit larger display, a much better 2080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a way brighter display.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a much greater hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has more RAM. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S counts with a bit better camera than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a lot tinier sensor offering a way worse image quality, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S also counts with a back facing camera with much more megapixels. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S has better battery performance than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.