Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.5 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 12 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2022-11-01 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.41 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.32 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.97 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has a general score of 91.5, which is much better than Motorola Droid Turbo's overall score of 76.4. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer's body is much newer and thinner, but heavier than Motorola Droid Turbo. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has 12 version and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer and the Motorola Droid Turbo count with quite similar processing units, because although the Motorola Droid Turbo has 5 GB lesser RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with an additional graphics processor. Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a higher screen pixel density.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer also has higher 30 frames per second video frame rates, a bigger camera aperture and a much more megapixels back-facing camera.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 224 GB more internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer counts with a bit superior battery life than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 4300mAh battery size instead of 3900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.