Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.5 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-11-01 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.41 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.32 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black | Mystic indigo |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.97 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer is better than Motorola Moto G Stylus, with a 91.5 score against 79.7. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer's construction is newer and just a little bit thinner than the Motorola Moto G Stylus's, although it is also just a little heavier. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has a more recent 12 version and Motorola Moto G Stylus has Android 11.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has a bit better processor than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer also has more RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer features a little more vivid display than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a little bit larger display and a quite better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus counts with just a bit more memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has a bit better battery life than Moto G Stylus, because it has a 4300mAh battery size.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer shoots much better photos and videos than Motorola Moto G Stylus, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, a F1.7 aperture and the same video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer also has a much more mega-pixels camera and a lot larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.