Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android |
| 2022-11-01 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.60 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Frosted Blue, Onyx Black, Stardust Purple and White | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | TFT |
| 393 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 900 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MC4 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.77 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, having an 84.7 score against 75.7. Although it's the best in this comparison review, the Galaxy A32 design is older, a little bit heavier and thicker than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro. Galaxy A32 works with Android OS, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro has Android 12 OS.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro features a much better screen than Galaxy A32, because it has a quite bigger screen, a better quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. Samsung Galaxy A32 features a really superior performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro takes a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A32, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro also counts with a more mega-pixels camera.
Samsung Galaxy A32 features a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro and the Galaxy A32 have quite similar battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.