Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-01-15 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.34 x 2.92 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| -- | 6.77 ounces |
| Aurora Purple, Midnight Black and Ocean Teal | Mystic indigo |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2710 x 1220 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 444 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 1800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 710 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G is slightly better than the Moto G Stylus, having an 83.1 score against 79.7. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has newer 13 version while Moto G Stylus has Android 11 version, offering a couple nice extra features and improved performance. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G is a extremely newer phone, and it is also somewhat thinner and much lighter than Moto G Stylus.
The Moto G Stylus counts with a much better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G counts with a brighter display than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because it has a little bit more pixels per display inch, a quite better resolution of 1220 x 2710px and a little bit larger screen.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G features a way bigger storage to install games and applications than Moto G Stylus, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity and an external memory card slot that admits up to 1 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has greater battery duration than Moto G Stylus, because it has a 5100mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G captures a bit better pictures and videos than Moto G Stylus, because it has a much bigger camera sensor, a lot higher resolution back-facing camera and a larger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.