Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2024-01-15 | 2018-10-20 |
| 6.34 x 2.92 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 5.93 ounces |
| Aurora Purple, Midnight Black and Ocean Teal | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2710 x 1220 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 1800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 710 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.21 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.88 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, having a global score of 84.2 against 83.1. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G features a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a bit higher pixels density, a little higher 1220 x 2710 pixels resolution and a little bit larger screen.
Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) features a way better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G takes a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a way larger sensor providing a much higher image quality, a back-facing camera with lot more MP and a bigger aperture.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G counts with a superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB more internal storage. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G counts with a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.