Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2024-01-15 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.34 x 2.92 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.09 ounces |
| Aurora Purple, Midnight Black and Ocean Teal | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2710 x 1220 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| 1800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 SM7435-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 710 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, having a score of 87.1 against 83.1. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G features a little sharper screen than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a little worse 1220 x 2710 pixels resolution and a bit less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bit larger screen.
The Galaxy Note9 features a much faster processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G takes better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low light photos and video, it also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back camera with much more MP.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has a superior storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has 256 GB internal memory and an external memory slot that allows up to 1 TB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has improved battery performance than Galaxy Note9, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.