Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.1 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-01-15 | 2019-06-20 |
| 6.34 x 2.95 x 28.98 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.93 ounces |
| Forest Green, Lavender Purple and Midnight Black | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.62 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.21 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A60 is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, with a general score of 82.3 against 77.1. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A60 has the previous 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has Android 13 version. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro counts with a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy A60, because although it has a just a little worse display density, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy A60 features a much greater hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro features a very superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A60, because it has a SD card slot that allows up to 1 TB and 128 GB more internal memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has a way better battery life than Galaxy A60, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro takes greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A60, because it has a camera with a way better 200 mega pixels resolution, a larger aperture for better photos in low light situations and a much bigger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.