Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.1 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-01-15 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.34 x 2.95 x 28.98 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 6.53 ounces |
| Forest Green, Lavender Purple and Midnight Black | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, having a general score of 91.8 against 77.1. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A71 5G has the older 11 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has Android 13. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has a little sharper display than Galaxy A71 5G. They have exactly the same 1080 x 2400px resolution, a display of the same size and the same amount of pixels per inch in the screen.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has a much greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A71 5G, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB and more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a much greater hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro features just a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G's camera is very similar to the camera in Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, although the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light photography and video, a lot less megapixels back-facing camera and a smaller sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.