Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.1 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-01-15 | 2019-09-29 |
| 6.34 x 2.95 x 28.98 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 6.63 ounces |
| Forest Green, Lavender Purple and Midnight Black | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.21 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M30s is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, getting an 83.3 score against 77.1. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy M30s has the older 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has Android 13. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy M30s, because although it has a quite worse pixels amount in each display inch, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little bit bigger display.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro counts with much more storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M30s, because it has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB and 256 GB internal memory. The Galaxy M30s has a much powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Galaxy M30s has better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, because it has a 20 percent more battery size. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro captures clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy M30s, because it has a camera in the back with a much higher 200 MP resolution, a way larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and photographs and a bigger aperture for better low light images.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.