Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 70 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2015-11-24 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.91 x 2.99 x 0.34 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Black and Blue |
| Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.4 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE and GPRS | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.9 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Droid Turbo has a general score of 76.4, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 3's overall score of 70. Both devices in this comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Droid Turbo has older 4.4.4 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 has Android 5.1. Motorola Droid Turbo's design is older, incredibly thicker and just a bit heavier than Xiaomi Redmi Note 3.
The Motorola Droid Turbo has a quite better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 3, and although they both have 3 GB of RAM, the Motorola Droid Turbo also has a graphics processor and 3 more CPU cores. Motorola Droid Turbo features a brighter display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 3, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a better pixel count in each inch in the screen.
The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 3, because it has a lot better 3840x2160 video definition, a larger aperture to capture better photos and videos in poorly lited environments and a much higher resolution camera. The Motorola Droid Turbo's memory for games and applications is just as good as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 one, both have the same internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 counts with just a bit better battery life than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Motorola Droid Turbo is also the cheapest one, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.