Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-01-23 | 2015-11-02 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 190.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6P is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, getting an 80.3 score against 74.1. The Google Nexus 6P body is somewhat thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, but it is just a bit heavier and was released around a year before. The Google Nexus 6P features a little sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because it has a better 1440 x 2560 resolution, a quite larger screen and a higher display density.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 and the Google Nexus 6P count with very similar CPUs, and although the Google Nexus 6P has less RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. Google Nexus 6P has a slightly better storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
The Google Nexus 6P features just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because although it has a back facing camera with a worse resolution, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the Google Nexus 6P also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality. Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 features improved battery life than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 4100mAh of battery capacity.
Although Google Nexus 6P is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Xiaomi Redmi Note 4. If you want to save some dollars, you can get Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, and give up some specs and features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.