Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-01-23 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic indigo |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| $ 190.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G Stylus has a general score of 79.7, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4's general score of 74.1. Both phones we are comparing here include Android OS, but Motorola Moto G Stylus has older 11 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 has Android 7.0 Nougat version. Motorola Moto G Stylus's construction is way newer, but just a little thicker and somewhat heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 counts with a little bit better screen than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, it also counts with a just a little greater count of pixels per inch in the screen. Motorola Moto G Stylus's processing unit is just as good as the processor in Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, both of them have 8 cpu cores and a 4 GB RAM memory.
Moto G Stylus features a much better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because it has a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a larger aperture to take better captures and video in low light environments and a camera in the back with lot more MP. Moto G Stylus counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because it has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 features just a bit longer battery lifetime than Moto G Stylus, because it has a 2% bigger battery capacity.
Although Moto G Stylus is a better device, it is way more expensive than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Moto G Stylus, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.