Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android |
| 2017-01-23 | 2021-01-22 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum | Metal and Plastic |
| $ 190.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 401 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.02 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, getting a global score of 84.7 against 74.1. The Galaxy A32 has Android operating system, and Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 comes with Android 7.0 Nougat operating system. The Galaxy A32 is a much newer device than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, but it is a little thicker and heavier.
Galaxy A32 counts with a CPU that is just as good as the processor in Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, both have a 4 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processor. Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater display pixels density and a higher 1080 x 1920 resolution.
The Galaxy A32 captures much clearer videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because it has a way more MP camera in the back, a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light images and video. The Samsung Galaxy A32 has a superior memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a SD card slot that allows up to 1 TB.
Galaxy A32 counts with superior battery duration than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.