Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2017-01-23 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| $ 190.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a general score of 77.8, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4's score of 74.1. Both of these phones use Android OS, but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has the older 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 has Android 7.0 Nougat version. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro's construction is a lot newer and noticeably thinner, but also notably heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4 counts with a much better performing processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because it has a lot brighter screen, a way bigger display, a way higher 2200 x 2480 resolution and a just a bit more pixels per display inch.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes much clearer photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because it has a way higher resolution back-facing camera, a larger aperture to take better photography and video in low light situations and a much higher video definition. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a superior memory for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, because it has a 39% bigger battery size.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Xiaomi Redmi Note 4. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.