Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-02-14 | 2017-09-22 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 145.00 | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 8 has a score of 85, which is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X's overall score of 71.8. IPhone 8's construction is lighter and thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, even when they were released only 7 months apart. The Apple iPhone 8 has a slightly better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, although it has a little smaller display, a little bit worse display pixel density and a way worse resolution of 750 x 1334 pixels.
The iPhone 8 counts with much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity. The iPhone 8 features a superior performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has 1 GB less RAM and a lower number of cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
IPhone 8 shoots much better videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has a less mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a larger aperture and a much higher (4K) video resolution. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X counts with a much longer battery duration than Apple iPhone 8, because it has 4100mAh of battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone 8 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Apple iPhone 8, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.