Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Apple |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-02-14 | 2018-09-21 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 145.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XS Max is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, having a general score of 84.5 against 71.8. Although Apple iPhone XS Max is way heavier than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, it's a little bit thinner and also newer. Apple iPhone XS Max features a brighter screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has a just a bit better count of pixels in each inch in the screen, a larger screen and a better 1242 x 2688px resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X counts with a bit more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone XS Max, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 128 GB. The Apple iPhone XS Max has a superior processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has lesser processing cores , it also counts with more RAM memory and a 64 bits processing unit.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X features longer battery performance than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has 4100mAh of battery capacity. IPhone XS Max has a much better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has a camera with a worse resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better photos in low light environments and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Although iPhone XS Max is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, giving up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.