Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-02-14 | 2016-10-20 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 145.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel XL is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, with a score of 81.3 against 71.8. Even though Google Pixel XL is a better cellphone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, it must be noted that it's also a little heavier and a little bit thicker. Google Pixel XL counts with a little bit better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Google Pixel XL also has a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a higher pixel density.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X counts with a little better performance than Google Pixel XL, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with more cores. Google Pixel XL has a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Google Pixel XL takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has a less mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, and they both have the same aperture, the Google Pixel XL also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X features superior battery life than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 19% larger battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel XL is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, and give up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.