Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2017-02-14 | 2024-08-08 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 145.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.02 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 has a score of 81.2, which is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X's general score of 71.8. Even though the Motorola Edge 50 is a little bit heavier than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, it's a bit thinner and newer. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 has the previous 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X features a way better performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 features a more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen, a higher 1220 x 2712 resolution and a bigger display.
The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a superior memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage. The Motorola Edge 50 has longer battery duration than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has a 22 percent bigger battery capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 captures way better videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has a camera in the back with lot more MP, a larger aperture for better images and video in low-light environments and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.