Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android |
| 2017-02-14 | 2021-01-22 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Metal | Metal and Plastic |
| $ 145.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 401 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.02 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 has a score of 84.7, which is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X's 71.8 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy A32 has Android operating system, while Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X has Android 6.0 Marshmallow operating system. The Samsung Galaxy A32 body is way newer than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X's, but it is heavier and a little bit thicker.
Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a CPU that is just as good as Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X's CPU, and although the Samsung Galaxy A32 has a greater amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X features a more vivid display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1080 x 1920px and more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Galaxy A32 takes a lot better videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has a larger aperture to capture better low light photos and videos, a back facing camera with lot more megapixels and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution. The Galaxy A32 has a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB and more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy A32 has improved battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.