Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2017-02-14 | 2017-02-24 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Gold |
| Metal | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 145.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.02 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C9 Pro has an overall score of 81, which is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X's 71.8 global score. Both devices in this review have the same Android 6.0 Marshmallow OS, so both of them should offer the same operating system features. Even though the Galaxy C9 Pro and Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X were released with only a few months difference, Galaxy C9 Pro's design is somewhat thinner but also heavier.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X features a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 1920, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X also counts with a bit more pixels per screen inch. Galaxy C9 Pro features a much bigger storage to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has 32 GB more internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X and the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro both feature really similar processing units, and although the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a higher amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X features a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 4100mAh battery size.
Galaxy C9 Pro takes clearer videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy C9 Pro also has a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light captures and video and a back facing camera with more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.