Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2017-02-14 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.94 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Metal | -- |
| $ 145.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a global score of 77.8, which is a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X's overall score of 71.8. Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is way heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, it's thinner and also incredibly newer. Both devices we are comparing here come with Android operating system, but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has older 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X counts with a much better performing processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 13 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with an incredibly better display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has a quite better number of pixels in each screen inch, a much better resolution of 2200 x 2480 and a lot larger display.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better battery performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has a 39% larger battery capacity.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, because it has a bigger camera aperture, a back camera with way more mega pixels and a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.