Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | -- |
| 2018-02-22 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.24 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, getting a score of 81.6 against 75.8. Even when Google Pixel 2 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro were only released 4 months apart, Google Pixel 2 is a bit thinner and notably lighter. Google Pixel 2 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better pixels density.
Google Pixel 2 has a little bit better storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory. Google Pixel 2 has a bit superior processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro features a much better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. The Google Pixel 2 has a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 5 Pro, because it has a much better (4K) video resolution, a back facing camera with more mega pixels and a larger aperture to capture better low light photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.