Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-11-23 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.22 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6P has a score of 80.3, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro's 77.2 general score. Google Nexus 6P's design is a bit lighter and somewhat thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, although it was released many years before. The Google Nexus 6P features just a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Google Nexus 6P has a little bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Google Nexus 6P features just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light captures, it also counts with a larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a way higher 3840x2160 video definition and a more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has slightly more storage capacity for games and applications than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 256 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has a bit longer battery lifetime than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 16% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.