Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-11-23 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.22 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A80 is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, with a overall score of 84.9 against 77.2. Although it's the best phone in this review, the Galaxy A80 construction is thicker and somewhat heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro. Samsung Galaxy A80 counts with a bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A80 also has more RAM memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro features a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy A80, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2280 pixels resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has a little bit more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 256 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A80 shoots much clearer videos and photos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low light captures and video, it also counts with a much more mega-pixels back facing camera, a way bigger back camera sensor and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro counts with a little better battery life than Galaxy A80, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.