Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android |
| 2018-11-23 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.22 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Metal and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A90 5G is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, with a 90.5 score against 77.2. Galaxy A90 5G counts with Android OS, and Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro works with Android 8.1 Oreo OS. The Galaxy A90 5G body has the same thickness than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, but it is heavier.
Galaxy A90 5G counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro. Both have a 6 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2280, it also counts with a just a little better screen pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G captures much clearer photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for capturing photos or video in low-light environments, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video quality, a lot bigger sensor providing a much better image quality and a back-facing camera with lot more MP.
Galaxy A90 5G features a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD card slot that allows up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a little better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.