Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-11-23 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.22 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Metal and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 8 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, getting a overall score of 77.8 against 77.2. Even though the vivo X Fold 3 Pro is heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, it's extremely thinner and also noticeably newer. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has the older 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has Android 8.1 Oreo.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro features a very superior processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much more vibrant display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has a much higher resolution of 2200 x 2480, a bigger screen, a just a little higher amount of pixels per display inch and a way brighter display.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a much higher image and video quality, a larger camera aperture for better low-light captures, a way better video definition and a much more megapixels back camera.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has a 43% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.