Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2019-01-15 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 409 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.44 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 has an overall score of 84.7, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7's 80.3 global score. Galaxy A32's design is extremely newer than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7's, although it is a little heavier and thicker. Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 has a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a way better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a way better number of pixels per inch of display.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 counts with a bit bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A32, because although it has a SD memory slot that allows 768 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage. Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy A32. They have 8 CPU cores and 4 GB of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 captures clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the same resolution camera and a same size aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 also has higher 120 fps video frame rates. The Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with improved battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because it has a 25 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.