Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| 2019-01-15 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A80 is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, with a global score of 84.9 against 80.3. Despite being the best device we are comparing, we must tell that it's also somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker. Samsung Galaxy A80 has a bit more powerful CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy A80 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 features a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a little greater display density. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 captures just a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A80, and although they both have a 0.5 inches sensor, the same resolution back camera and the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 also has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light images and video and faster video frame rate.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 has much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A80, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 256 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 has a little better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.