Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2019-01-15 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A90 5G has a general score of 90.5, which is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7's 80.3 global score. Despite being the best cellphone in this comparison, we must note that it's also a bit thicker and a bit heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a display that is just as good as Xiaomi Redmi Note 7's screen, because although the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a just a bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a bit bigger display and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. The Galaxy A90 5G has a bit bigger storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A90 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 512 GB.
Galaxy A90 5G features a slightly better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have a back camera with a 48 megapixels and a 0.5 inches sensor, the Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video quality. The Galaxy A90 5G features a little better battery life than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.