Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Samsung |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-01-15 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black and Gold |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.18 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.44 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C9 Pro has a global score of 81, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7's 80.3 general score. Galaxy C9 Pro's design is somewhat thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, although it's a little bit heavier and was released about 23 months before. Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 counts with a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a little bigger screen, a little higher number of pixels per inch in the display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340px.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 features a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 shoots much better pictures and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 also has a bigger aperture, a back camera with a much better 48 megapixels resolution and higher video frame rates.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 has much more storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 256 GB, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 also has more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's battery lifetime is very similar to the battery performance in Xiaomi Redmi Note 7.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.