Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-01-15 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Red | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.18 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 is a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with a general score of 80.3 against 77.8. Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 is a incredibly older and notably thicker cellphone than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Xiaomi managed to make it lighter anyway. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a lot better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because it has a little higher number of pixels in each inch in the screen, a bigger screen and a much higher resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 has an extremely better CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 12 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures much better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because it has a lot better video quality, a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light photography and video, a much bigger sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photos and a back camera with more megapixels.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a superior storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because it has a 5700mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.