Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.1 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | Motorola |
| Android | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-09-26 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.35 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Forest green, Mineral grey and Pearl white | Black and Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 239.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G90T chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali G76 MC4 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 3.41 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Droid Turbo is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro, with a overall score of 76.4 against 71.1. Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4 operating system, and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro comes with Android operating system. Even though Motorola Droid Turbo is much older and notably thicker than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro, it's construction is still lighter.
The Motorola Droid Turbo has a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro, because although it has 4 lesser cores (but faster) and lesser RAM, it also counts with an extra graphics processor. Motorola Droid Turbo has a more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a better amount of pixels per inch of display.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro counts with a superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 32 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 256 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro has a little longer battery life than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Motorola Droid Turbo shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro, although it has worse video frame rate and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking photos and video in low-light environments, they both have the same video definition.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Motorola Droid Turbo is also a lot cheaper, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.