Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2019-10-16 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.23 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Cosmic Purple, Moonlight White, Nebula Purple, Neptune Blue and Space Black | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Glass and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 227.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 has an overall score of 81.9, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8's 74.6 overall score. The Google Pixel 4 is a a little thinner and somewhat lighter cellphone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8, even though they were released only 0 months apart. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2280 and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per display inch.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 counts with a little bit more storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 128 GB. The Google Pixel 4 has a bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has 3 GB more RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 shoots much better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 also counts with a way higher 48 megapixels resolution camera and a way larger camera sensor which gives a lot better photo and video quality.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 features a superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
The Google Pixel 4 is way more expensive than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.